David Corenswet’s take on Jonathan Bailey’s “masculine” moment in Wicked has sparked a heated online debate.
David Corenswet and Jonathan Bailey recently chatted for Variety’s Actors on Actors, sharing anecdotes from their careers. During the 42-minute conversation, the two actors bonded over a surprising common experience: both have filmed kissing scenes while in the air.
In Wicked: For Good, Jonathan Bailey stars as Fiyero, who, in one moment, is carried aloft by Elphaba (played by Cynthia Erivo) as they sing “As Long As You’re Mine.”
In the interview, David remarked on how masculine Jonathan appeared during that airborne moment. “You faced a bigger challenge. You’re being lifted by Cynthia. She’s levitating you,” he noted.
“Many men would assume there’s no way to look powerful or in control when being raised by a woman,” David added, to which Jonathan replied, “That’s the greatest privilege.”
“Even as she lifts you by the arms, you still manage to project masculinity,” David continued, describing the moment as remarkable. Jonathan responded with a playful compliment: “Well done, mate. It’s easier when you’re the one carrying someone.”
Jonathan paused briefly, then said, “Oh my God, yes. It was a total honor. I’d gladly be carried by Cynthia and Ari for the rest of my life. It was a treat to do my part and share a moment like that.”
David’s comments quickly went viral, provoking mixed reactions online. Some viewers felt the praise missed the mark or phrased it awkwardly. A number of tweets criticized the way the remark was delivered, suggesting it was uncomfortable to watch and that the idea of maintaining masculinity in such a scenario could feel off-putting.
Others defended David, arguing that being carried and vulnerable can be a legitimate, non-toxic form of masculinity and that adults are entitled to discuss shared experiences without it implying hostility toward women or femininity.
Supporters pointed out that the film’s portrayal demonstrates that masculine presentation can coexist with vulnerability and power, offering a broader, less rigid view of gender roles.
Overall, the moment has reignited conversations about masculinity, vulnerability, and how weighty ideas about gender are interpreted in media and online discourse. It prompts the question: should performances that reveal vulnerability be seen as undermining masculinity, or as a healthier, more nuanced expression of strength?
What do you think about the idea that vulnerability and physical risk in performance can coexist with masculinity? Do you find the discussion helpful for understanding modern portrayals of male characters, or do you think it overcomplicates a simple moment? Share your perspective in the comments.
