A recent series of roster moves by the Dodgers has sparked intrigue and raised questions among fans. The return of Ben Rortvedt to the Dodgers' roster has reopened a long-standing debate, and it's time to delve into the implications.
Last week, the Dodgers made some intriguing decisions, starting with the waiver claim of Michael Siani from the Yankees. This move, however, led to a chain reaction. Andy Ibáñez, signed to a significant contract, was subsequently DFA'ed to accommodate Siani, only to be claimed by the Athletics. But the real twist came when the Dodgers silently waived former catcher Ben Rortvedt, who was then claimed by the Reds. In a surprising turn of events, the Dodgers re-acquired Rortvedt, leading to the DFA of lefty Anthony Banda, a key bullpen piece in recent seasons.
While Banda had his share of supporters, the move can be justified given the Dodgers' pitching depth and Banda's slight regression in 2025. However, the real excitement lies in Rortvedt's return, which opens up a whole new chapter in the Dodgers' long-term plans.
With Rortvedt on board, the focus shifts to Dalton Rushing, a player with minor league options who has been a key part of the Dodgers' offseason discussions. The question arises: what does Rortvedt's return mean for Rushing's future with the team?
The Dodgers now have a clear path to trade Rushing, and it's an option that could benefit both parties. Sending Rushing back to Triple-A to start the season might be the best course of action, allowing him to regain confidence and improve his skills. If he excels in Triple-A, his trade value could skyrocket.
Andrew Friedman and Brandon Gomes have consistently stated their commitment to finding playing time for Rushing, but the Rortvedt acquisition has complicated matters. Trade rumors have already begun circulating, with the Red Sox reportedly showing interest this offseason. It remains to be seen if the Dodgers will stick to their word or if a trade is indeed the next logical step.
But here's where it gets controversial: Friedman and Gomes have been vocal about their support for Rushing, but their lack of a clear plan for their former top prospect is evident. Trading him might be the most straightforward move, especially considering the Dodgers' farm system, which is often used as a powerful tool in major trades.
So, will the Dodgers stick to their guns and find a way to keep Rushing, or will they capitalize on his trade value? The answers lie in the upcoming weeks, as the Dodgers navigate their roster decisions. What do you think, Dodgers fans? Is trading Rushing the right move, or should the team stick to its initial plans? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!
